• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Montague Reporter

The Montague Reporter

The Voices of the Villages

  • Read
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact
  • Donate

News

An Interview With The Lentils

April 7, 2022

By MIKE JACKSON

TURNERS FALLS – It may seem backward for an artist to move to Los Angeles at the point of their career when they decide to not be famous, but that seems to be the path Luke Csehak has taken.
Eight years ago he was the songwriter-singer-guitarist at the nucleus of the Happy Jawbone Family Band, a Brattleboro collective that played earnest, chaotic, jangling pop songs always on the verge of falling apart. Happy Jawbone’s charms were on the cusp of receiving a mass audience, thanks to a proper record-and-marketing deal, when the band itself suddenly fell apart in an irreversible, cable-rock-documentary sort of manner.
Csehak swore – so went local legend – never to play those songs again, hitting the reset button as The Lentils, a project more deliberately focused on his solo work. After releasing a debut, Brattleboro Is Flooding, that captured the apocalyptic feeling of a small-city music scene dealing with deaths, breakups, and natural disaster, Csehak headed west.
All that is ancient history, and this Friday marks the release of the sixth (or so) Lentils LP, Budget Alchemy, on two Greenfield-based labels: Feeding Tube for the vinyl, and Flower Sounds with a small-batch cassette.
The album is intricately multi-tracked, a slew of instruments swirling and pulsing, shrouding what may be Csehak’s strongest batch of songs yet in an uneasy, wistful ambiance. “How come all these gorgeous oceans are churning in my mind?” he sings. “The problem with memory is it can never be touched…”
I caught up with Csehak by phone a couple weeks back after getting an advance listen to the tracks – the weird kind of deal journalists make about music. We had a good long talk, and the transcript has been substantially reordered and edited for clarity.

Csehak markets the new product.

MR: Every time I turn a recorder on, I say this, but if there’s anything that is off the record, let me know.

LC: Okay, I will let you know. I do like going off the record, just as like a formality. I usually don’t actually mean it. I don’t see myself going off the record too much – my heart’s an open book.

MR: How is it out there? Are you in Los Angeles? Have you been there longer than you were in Brattleboro?

LC: Almost. I was in Brattleboro eight years, so it’s coming up…. I’ve been here for almost seven years now. That will mark something.

MR: I think I was probably at four of the first five shows that were billed as The Lentils, and it was cool to watch what the Lentils sound was kind of cohere. This new record – is this the “big step” record for you?

LC: In a way – it’s sort of the conclusion of processes that I began when I first moved here. They’re songs that I wrote all throughout my time here; it’s not all new. One of them actually is from Brattleboro, it just didn’t make an album. Not because it’s not good – I’d say that these songs didn’t make it onto albums because they were too good for the other albums, they just didn’t fit. I realized they all fit together and made a nice little family, so I finally got around to finishing up that family.

MR: What is the scene out there for you? Do you have a day job?

LC: Yeah! I finally got out of the restaurant biz, and now I’m working as a therapist. I went through my masters, I’ve been out of school for like a year and been working in private practice under a licensed therapist, and hopefully I’ll be licensed next year.

MR: Is that the third school for you or the second? You went to Naropa, right?

LC: Yeah, I went to Naropa for undergrad, I studied at the Jack Kerouac School of Disembodied Poetics, and I thought I would never go back to school. But then I met some people who were doing the the music and therapist thing together. Mostly this guy Jonny Kosmo – he’s an LA guy, sort of a real scene-maker but not in that type of way, he’s just a really good friend who gets all of his friends together to do cool things.

MR: An organizer of people.

LC: Yeah, and he’s a therapist…. It dovetails really well with an artistic practice. I feel like a lot of what I was doing musically was preparing me for therapy.

What I’m going for in music is not really [being] the most innovative musician, that’s not really interesting to me. I’m all about exploring the human condition, figuring out what the hell are we doing on this earth in these weird flesh suits? And why do we have all these feelings, what are they good for? What is their nature?

So I’ve been investigating that through music, and then figured out that it’s given me some pretty cool skills for talking about that with other people who are having a lot of trouble figuring that out.

MR: What were you doing in Vermont?

LC: Um. I was exploring the nature of human connection.

MR: You guys were from Connecticut, am I remembering that right?

LC: Yeah, I grew up in Connecticut, but let’s keep that off the record.

That’s one of the times where you can keep that on the record. As long as that doesn’t get you in trouble with other journalists…

MR: Were you in bands before Happy Jawbone?

LC: No, not really. You couldn’t call them bands, more just like improvisation crews.

MR: When you talk to people in Los Angeles about what was up with Brattleboro during the time that you lived there, how do you try to explain it?

LC: I always say it was a really special place for a few years, where you’d just walk out your door and hang out with the best songwriters working, and just riff, and maybe go to a swim spot and skinny dip with them. It’s pretty cool to just be in the bosom of a group of people who are really working on something and really inspiring each other, and working off of each other.

MR: And some of the best producers, too.

LC: Yeah. But they’re all insane, so it’s not a big surprise that it didn’t last very long.

MR: We were downstream from Brattleboro in Turners, but there was obviously so much heavy stuff going on in that scene during those years.

LC: I see Brattleboro as sort of the north pole of the Western Mass world. There was a lot of shit happening, really parallel, in the different scenes where a lot of shit was coming to the surface.

MR: Do you like any of the Happy Jawbone records?

LC: Oh yeah. The Silk Pistol I think is a really solid album. The Christmas album is also pretty good. It’s hard for me to judge that one, because we had a lot of fun making it, so it’s very nostalgic for me.

MR: When I’m showing that band to someone I usually go with Okay, Midnight.

LC: Yeah, see, people love that. I don’t get it. I think I was trying to do this like punk cosplay thing. I was never really a punk, I just thought it was fun to pretend… It was like that “mer-punk” thing where it’s trying to not actually make punk music, but I was putting a lot of pressure on myself to connect with people.

Sometimes I miss singing like that style, where you’re singing very loud, straining your vocal cords and it resonates in your body in a specific way that feels pseudo-orgasmic. But that’s a big trust fall to lay on an audience. And it was like maybe 10% of the shows people were able and willing to take that trust fall and it was magic, but the vast majority of the shows people were like, who the fuck this guy, why is he trying so hard?

Now I much prefer this quieter music that I make, more low-pressure music. You can come to me, if you like.

MR: You know, I didn’t like that band the first time I saw you. And I think that might have made me like it more in the long run.

LC: I’d love to hear what you hated about that band!

MR: I barely remember. It was at Flywheel and I was there to see another band, and you guys were in the way, and there was a toy piano…

LC: The toy piano! It was pink, too – a very twee move, and people really had a hard time with that. But it did actually sound pretty cool….

I do miss get getting panned. That was a fun thing about Happy Jawbone is that people would really pan it. Now that I’ve self-sabotaged so much nobody bothers to write about my band anymore — that means nobody pans it. There’s this beautiful ego destruction that happens when you read someone just totally shit on your baby that I sort of miss.

MR: Would the band read them out together?

LC: Yeah! We’d process it, and laugh and have a really good time. When someone pans an album, that’s such a narcissistic act for the writer, the critic. “I denounce this in the name of my taste – there is an objective taste, and this album misses the mark.”

The ones that hurt more were the ones that were accurate – like “it’s not horrible, but it’s just not that special.”

MR: Sitting here it kind of looks like you’ve been part of an exodus of musicians from Brattleboro to Los Angeles. Does that feel true, on the other end?

LC: Yeah, there’s still a handful of people from Brattleboro that I still see around. Some of them are still close friends…. But I do end up gravitating towards other people from New England. It’s a funny thing where people from New England in LA sort of find each other. People call it “East Coast retirement.”

MR: Do you go swimming and surfing and things like that?

LC: Yeah, I still haven’t done the surfing thing. I plan to. I’m doing T’ai Chi, though, and I feel like that’s a good preparation for learning how to surf…. I’ve got this class that meets outdoors in the park and it’s great. I love T’ai Chi, it’s been a real lifesaver during the quarantine.

MR: So is this the fifth main Lentils record?

LC: I feel like there’s more. I was trying to count them up the other day and it’s hard because there’s the live album, there’s the Pillow Lava things – do you count that as one album or three, or two? I sort of count that as one double album.

MR: Those tapes were the first time I’d heard you getting deeper instrumental stuff going.

LC: I’ve been doing that all along, but just sort of keeping it secreted away in this Pillow Lava project. A lot of that stuff is from Happy Jawbone days, but it was too weird for Happy Jawbone, and I continued making that stuff and finally put it all together for the Pillow Lava series.

MR:There were kids from the Putney School playing on one of these, also? How did that come about?

LC: My friend Julia Tadlock was putting on a play at the Putney School – Eurydice – and she asked me to write some music and score it for the kids there. So I wrote some incidental music for wind quartet, and they played it while the play was going. It’s all on the Bandcamp.

Count that as one – Brattleboro is Flooding was the first one, so that’s two, and then Botanical Castings, three, 11 New Flavors…, four, and Ixnay is five so this will be six.

MR: Is your approach to being able to put albums together now different from, or to any extent a reaction to, how that process went in Happy Jawbone?

LC: No, I feel like I was doing that in Happy Jawbone, I just have gotten better at it. Like, with The Silk Pistol I feel like we really hit that – that album has a real nice album form to it that’s pretty similar to what I do with the Lentils now.

That was the second-to-last one, before the last one, which was an interesting failure, the self-titled Happy Jawbone album….

I don’t really love recording in studios. Recording with people who know how to record is sort of frustrating for me – I don’t know, I just have a different ear than most people, I want things to sound a particular way, and it’s almost impossible for me to convey that to an engineer or producer…

I’ve recorded with pro people; I recorded with Justin Pizzoferrato for the last Happy Jawbone album on Mexican Summer. And they’re all like really good at what they did, but it doesn’t it doesn’t sound like what I wanted it to sound like.

But you know, people like those albums. That’s good. I just don’t really care for them myself. Because I have this idea about what those songs sound like, and it sort of sounds like a Shelbyville version what I think the songs are.

MR: Who plays the music that we hear on this new one?

LC: I think it’s the only album that is 100% all me. The last one only had a couple of people here and there. The songs are just sort of that style – it’s more like writing, it’s not really collaborative; it’s like an interior project, where I’m just like alone in my room, exploring my mind…

MR: You said that one of the songs was from before you went to California – did you mean written, or are some of these older recordings as well?

LC: The one that’s old is “Dark Days,” which was going to go on Brattleboro Is Flooding, actually, but it just didn’t fit.

MR: This new album does sound like a lot more work went into it.

LC: It’s a pretty painstaking process for me to make an album like that. I mean, I did it over seven years, I’d just check in with it every now and again: oh, does this new song fit in it? How can I change it to make it fit, or do I bother? Sort of putting the pieces together.

Making these albums is sort of a collage process, figuring out what pieces get along together, sort of like making a family.

MR: So this is stuff you’ve been working on by yourself, and for seven years – the classic “masterwork that the bedroom auteur has been crafting…”

LC: This is very much a maximum bedroom auteur album, sort of the pinnacle of that trajectory for me. I’m happy to be making some other collaborative albums, which hopefully will come out soon. We’ll see. It’s tricky getting people to put out your music, especially when you self-sabotage its sale as much as I do.

MR: Why do you do that?

LC: Well, I think I just don’t like the pressure of having to think about marketing the music. I feel like that really puts a pressure on what is a very fragile and delicate process. Some people are able to do it, I just have a real hard time if there’s any pressure on it, it really makes it come out weird and I don’t like it. So I’ve sort of made myself unsaleable so that I can go deeper.

But I’m trying to get out of that, actually.

Now that I have this other career as a therapist, I don’t have to worry about making money in music at all, so that pressure’s sort of gone, and I can think about like trying to share the music with the wider world without the pressure of having to make it a career….

Honestly, like, I’m not like a huge fan of music, really. I’ll listen to the stuff, but even making it, it feels good, but it’s sort of a mystery why I even do it. People ask me, you’re a musician? And I always sort of cringe when I have to answer yes….

I don’t know what I think about music, and I don’t really care to find out. I guess it’s a way of exploring human connection and that’s what it’s good for, but all the ideas and identity that go along with being a musician I find somatically repulsive – there’s a tightening in my gut and my throat, like a dizzy feeling when it comes up.

MR: Is there a live band version of The Lentils right now?

LC: I’m trying out a new thing for the record release show, which will be just a saxophone quartet, with me singing on top…. Hopefully we do okay. I think we’re only going to be able to practice right before the show. But it’s all music that’s written out now, in a score, and they’re all pro sax players so it should work out okay.

MR: Do you notate stuff out when you when you’re enlisting a band to play stuff?

LC: Yeah, I really like writing it out by hand, I have my manuscript paper and I figure it out. There are some songs where people come up with their own stuff.

And then actually, the next album – which is finished, and we’re trying to find a home for it, it’s called Hello Jane Goodall, Are You Listening? – is with a 10-piece setup. We recorded that in the studio, but the way that we play it live.

MR: I fell down a little rabbit hole because of some of those extra lyrics on the Bandcamp page.

LC: I like to do that – a little Easter egg. Because I like to write, but the process of getting people to read your writing is even more arduous and demeaning and dehumanizing than getting people to listen to your music, so I never actually do that. So I’ve found a fun way to get around that is to just put the writing that’s associated with the song in the “lyrics,” after the song lyrics.

It sort of happened by accident, actually – in the last album, Ixnay on the Entilslay, I’d just copied and pasted the lyrics from my notes, and it had all the extra lyrics and writing that had spawned the lyrics. I was like “oh, I might as well just keep it – who the hell reads lyrics anyways?”

MR: Do you have strangers who listen to your music?

LC: Yeah, there are people that I don’t know the listen to my music which confounds me… Randomly people hit me up. Somebody asked me to go to Florida last week and I was like, no. Absolutely not. Let’s see if I can tour to the Bay Area one day. It’s hard for me to even play a show outside of Northeast LA!

MR: Who should folks check out in LA right now? There’s no real use in sending you out as a scout if we’re not gonna be getting the inside dirt…

LC: There’s the heavy hitters like Mega Bog, Chris Cohen, Dear Nora, but the more obscure stuff… hmmm. Jonny Kosmo is a master of the smooth sound, Nehemiah St. Danger, Ben Varian, and the lowered are also doing great work in that strange funk world and no one knows about them.

Erika Bell is someone else no one knows about, which is a crime. Song structures produced to a level of deconstruction that I’ve never heard before. Then there’s bands like Dovestone, Banny Grove, Lina Tullgren, and Belly Belt who are making truly uncategorizable music. There’s some real freak stuff goes down over here.

MR: Have you been back to Vermont?

LC: Yeah, I’ve come back a couple times. Last time I came it was great, it was right when it was like sort of too cold to swim, but you could do it. We went down to Botanical Castings and jumped into the ice cold water and it was really nice. There’s that magical time in early spring when everyone gets out of their introvert cages.

MR: Well, I always wonder whether the New Englanders in California are gonna move back when you all run out of water down there.

LC: Yeah, that is something that I keep in mind. It’s not really sustainable living out here. Real estate is insane. The water…. Somehow it stays afloat, so it will probably stay afloat for a while more, but yeah, I don’t see really like settling down here.

Filed Under: News

Buckland, Bernardston Police Officer Arrested On Child Pornography Charges

May 18, 2021

By MIKE JACKSON

GREENFIELD – A man recently employed as a part-time reserve officer with the Buckland and Bernardston police departments was arraigned Tuesday on four counts of child pornography, according to the Northwest District Attorney’s (NWDA) office.

Jacob Wrisley, 40, formerly a Shelburne resident, was arrested by state police at his Millers Falls home on Monday and arraigned in Greenfield district court on Tuesday. According to an NWDA spokesperson, investigators issued a warrant for Wrisley after receiving a tip from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. State police searched his home and car and interviewed him before his arrest.

Wrisley was appointed as a part-time reserve officer in the Buckland Police Department in June 2018 after attending the local police academy and was still serving in that role as recently as last summer, according to public documents reviewed by the Montague Reporter. He was appointed as a part-time reserve officer in the Bernardston Police Department in May 2019.

Buckland police chief James Hicks confirmed on Wednesday that Wrisley worked for his department since 2018, and was suspended on Monday. Hicks said Wrisley worked one to two shifts for the town per month.

“Upon learning of the arrest and charges brought against Jacob Wrisley, I was shocked and saddened,” Bernardston police chief James Palmeri wrote in a public statement Wednesday afternoon. “I have a zero tolerance approach when it involves charges of this nature and some circumstances need immediate action. I have suspended Mr. Wrisley from the Bernardston Police Department and will be seeking his immediate termination from the Town.”

The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children operates a “CyberTipline” for reports of child sexual exploitation online.

According to the NWDA, Wrisley’s bail was set at $2,500 cash by Judge Mark Pasquariello, on the condition that Wrisley “have no unsupervised contact with any child under 18 including by electronic platforms; have no overnight stays where children under 18 are present; not work or volunteer for any organization that serves children under 18; [and] report according to a schedule to the probation department and notify probation if he moves.” A pretrial conference was scheduled for June 17.

Defense attorney Jack Godleski confirmed to the Reporter that he was appointed to represent Mr. Wrisley, but declined to comment about or on behalf of his client on Wednesday.

This article was last updated at 1:51 p.m. on Wednesday, May 19.

Creative Commons photo by Flickr user Scott Davidson

Filed Under: News

A storefront, not a search bar: Massive Bookshop goes online and stays local

January 7, 2021

By CHARLOTTE MURTISHAW

GREENFIELD – Groan if you want, but while most people used lockdown as a time to at least think about reading more books, Greenfield resident Andrew Ritchey took it a step further: he and a friend decided to reinvent book distribution. In September, Ritchey and New York-based friend Jamie Johnston started an online bookstore named Massive Bookshop out of Ritchey’s house.

The concept is simple and familiar: Customers go online, order books, and then receive the books. That being said, there’s much more under the surface. With a goal of growing into a worker-owned cooperative, Massive Bookshop is anti-Amazon and “anti-profit.” recycling all earnings back into stocking books or community organizations. All expenses and earnings are broken down in monthly newsletters to subscribers.

Ritchey talked with the Montague Reporter about the inspirations behind the left-leaning bookstore, how it all works, and the illusion of the necessity of rent.

Massive Bookshop’s inventory sits in cofounder Andrew Ritchey’s Greenfield basement – and attic (pictured). Image courtesy of Massive Bookshop

MR: What brought you to this? What’s the vision?

AR: The idea for the Massive Bookshop started in conversation with my friend Jamie, who is also in the book business. We were talking about how to do a book cooperative in an interesting way, particularly with the pandemic revealing all of the different weak points in the supply chain, and showing how retail businesses on Main Street are really vulnerable – especially businesses like book businesses, which are dependent on having lots of people continually in the store browsing.

I had worked for the co-op grocery store in town, Green Fields Market, and so I was also thinking about groceries, and seeing what had been happening in the Valley with farms coming together and delivering groceries to people or doing pickups.

We are selling the books online, but we want it to feel like it’s a storefront. We want it to feel like you go to the webpage and see featured books and featured collections and it feels kind of like walking in and seeing a shelf display, a particular subject or particular author. A lot of the work we’ve been putting into the website has been trying to do that. It makes sense to me.

A lot of people are selling books online and they just go on Amazon or they sell on other third-party marketplaces. There are also local bookstores that have a website, but in some cases the website doesn’t even have their inventory; you have to call them to ask if they have titles. In other cases the stuff they have online is not stuff they have in stock, which is the opposite extreme in terms of a bookstore website.

MR: I’m really interested by this idea of a “local internet business,” and was wondering if you’d be willing to talk a little bit more about what that means to you.

AR: With the pandemic we’ve seen a lot of businesses getting set up this way, so immediately there were tons of examples, like the Sunderland Farm Collaborative… It’s basically just a collaboration between several of the local farms. They just set up a website, and it’s great, because you can order from a bunch of different farms and they coordinate everything, so you might get some produce from Kitchen Garden Farm and some mushrooms from Mycoterra.

But it also to me seems like an interesting model of what a local online business can be like. With books in particular, rent is a huge problem, a huge barrier. If you think about local bookstores, like World Eye Bookshop in Greenfield for example, which had that big space on Main Street – they’ve been there for years and they had to move down the street to a much smaller space where they can’t stock even half the inventory that they had at the other store. I looked at that space on Main Street when they moved, and Cohn & Company wanted $2,500 a month for that space. It’s a big space, but you’ve got to sell a lot of books to even just cover that rent.

So there’s another way in which this local-online thing provides an opportunity to not pay rent, to not pay whatever percentage of your margin to a landlord, which is – I guess I’ll just say I don’t particularly like landlords. I don’t think that it’s right that that space is $2,500 a month, on Main Street in Greenfield. I don’t even know what retail business could go in there. And indeed, they haven’t rented it to a retail business.

So the pandemic has kind of exposed that, too: Is it really worth it to pay all this rent when it’s possible to reach customers through the internet at a fraction of the cost? The cost for maintaining this website is like $40 a month.

MR: And so is your whole stock just kept in your living space? How are you managing the physical inventory?

AR: Yeah, we have over 600 books in my basement and in my attic. They’re split: the used books are in the basement, and the new books are in the attic. We don’t have to shelve them, so they’re just organized in bins, and it’s been working so far to have that setup. Obviously we can’t stock tens of thousands of books in my house – maybe we could, I don’t know – but that feels like a manageable number to have in stock.

And we also place orders with our distributors, and publishers and suppliers we have a deal with. One of those distributors, Ingram, does direct-to-home shipping, so instead of us warehousing the books, we can just have a distributor mail books directly to the customer.

MR: I was imagining you probably learn about a lot of interesting stuff through the orders.

AR: Exactly. That’s the most fun for me. I’ve been doing a lot of special orders for people, and I’ve been finding out about tons of books.

The inventory that we started with was mostly my personal collection of books, just from years and years of buying books. I wanted us to have at least 500 books in stock that we could deliver to people. But more and more, people are making these special requests, so I’m finding out not only about specific books, but really cool publishers that I didn’t know about, authors that I didn’t know about – so when we buy books, I’m getting books from those publishers and those authors now in addition to the ones requested.

Part of the vision for the store as well is for it to be cooperative with the customers, where the inventory is determined in part by the people who are using the store, the kind of books that they like and are interested in.

MR: You mentioned the Sunderland Farm Collaborative. Were there other models or examples you were looking at as you were trying to figure out how to make this particular idea work?

AR: Well, if we can get it working and there’s interest, we want to properly incorporate as a worker-owned cooperative. Once you get into drafting bylaws for worker-owned cooperatives, there are lots of examples.

The one we were looking at was from the Mondragon in Spain – it’s in the Basque country, which is kind of Spain, kind of not – it’s sort of the model for worker-owned cooperatives. When it started, they had one worker cooperative and then it grew into all different segments of the industry of business there. Now they have this network of all these different cooperatives, all worker-owned. So that’s a cool model, not just how to structure a single cooperative but how to have networks of cooperatives.

You asked about specific models, and I feel like for me, the Sunderland Farm Collaborative was the main one in terms of having a cooperative do delivery and pickup, and I just thought it was really interesting. But like I said earlier, basically every local business has set up a website and started taking orders. I could point to a bunch of different businesses – Rise Above [Bakery] in Greenfield has started taking orders online, after the pandemic, and doing pickup.

So there were a bunch of different businesses not necessarily doing the cooperative thing, but doing a local online thing that you mentioned earlier, local internet. That was definitely an inspiration for setting up the website.

MR: I feel like we’re probably on the same level about this, but just keeping in mind that this is like a public information interview, what’s the problem with Amazon?

AR: Well, we have a great book on this subject called The Cost of Free Shipping. That book answers your question, I think. It’s interesting with books, because publishers do not like Amazon because Amazon sells books at a loss. They sell them super, super cheap, and publishers can’t compete with that, and bookstores obviously can’t compete. But publishers are also implicated in that, because they sell their books to distributors who sell them to Amazon. They could just not sell their books to Amazon, and Amazon wouldn’t have them to sell.

But they do. They knowingly sell the books because they want a huge volume of books, and they want to do that because they want to print a ton of books because they get a better margin when they print tons of books. Maybe a publisher can sell a thousand books, but if they print 15,000, they get those books at a much lower price, which is great because their margin improves. But then they have 14,000 books they can’t sell, so what they’ve been doing is sending them to Amazon, because Amazon buys them cheap. That’s kind of been perpetuating this whole cycle.

But if you’re asking me what my problem with Amazon is, it’s more about the way they actually make their money, which is not by selling books, but by collecting data and selling cloud-computing services to the military and all the things that are described in this book, The Cost of Free Shipping.

MR: Would you mind explaining a little bit about this wording that you’re using on the website, “anti-profit”? What does “anti-profit” actually mean in this context?

AR: “Anti-profit” means, in this context, that rather than trying to grow profits, accumulate profits, we’re actively trying to dispense with them, to get rid of them. The business needs to be sustainable, which means we have to continue to have a pool of money to buy books, so what we do is the profit that comes from books that we’ve bought in advance – stuff that we have invested in because we think they’re cool books – the net profit from the sales of those books stays in the business.

But the profits that come to us from the special orders, where someone has already paid for the book upfront, we don’t keep those because we don’t feel like we’re entitled to them. We didn’t even know about the book; we didn’t do any work to actually go get the book or convince somebody to buy it. They’re just telling us about this book, and in some cases when we do that direct-to-home delivery through the distributor, we don’t even pack and ship the book. The profits from those sales all go towards our friends, the community projects. We have two right now: Great Falls Books Through Bars and Touch the Sky.

The idea is if we can continue to get the special orders, that part of it is self-sustaining, because people are paying for the books and then we’re ordering for them, so the books are already bought when we buy them. If we can continue to get special orders and generate profit from that – the profit on the sale of each book from that is about two dollars, one or two dollars – we can continue to support these projects on an ongoing basis, as opposed to doing a fundraiser and being like “Oh, give to this organization.” We’re trying to provide a continuous support for that organization.

I don’t know if that answered your question. The reason that we chose the word “anti-profit” is that we’re not a non-profit organization – I mean legally we’re not, and we’re also just not. We don’t accept donations, this isn’t charity, we don’t think of the projects we support as charity projects. So we need a word other than “non-profit,” and “anti-profit” sort of encapsulates our orientation towards profit-seeking of the traditional capitalist variety.

And we’re a leftish bookstore: radical left theory and practice, movement organizing, communism, socialism, anarchism, anti-racism, anti-capitalism, social justice, etc. will be our specialty –  if we can stay in business long enough to have one!

Recent book requests by local readers through the “Massive Book Hook-Up”
determine much of the inventory the shop makes available on the site.

MR: I was thinking about it and I was thinking about the term “anti-racism,” and the way that that doesn’t erase any real dynamics but is instead more oppositionally framed – like “non-profit” is kind of neutered, and at this point we know some of the problems with non-profits, but “anti-profit” is enervated by a nice different sort of energy. I guess, to dive a little more into the weeds on the money question – and this is maybe more of a labor framing – is anyone making money for their labor through this? Are you making any money, or are you kind of just redirecting the flows of books and resources?

AR: Yeah, I’m not getting paid for my labor, and neither is Jamie.

When books that we have scouted – that we bought at book sales, or we bought because we think are cool and wanted to stock – when those books sell, that money stays in the business, the two dollars for each of those sales stays in the business to replenish the book-buying fund. If we don’t keep any of the money from the sale of these books we’re just going to run out of books. But it’s specifically used only for buying books.

The labor question is an interesting one, because obviously people need to make a living wage in order to survive, most people. And it’s important to ensure people are making a living. At the same time, selling your labor puts you in a certain kind of relation to a business, and also to other people. If I were just trying to make my living off this, I would have to sell the books for more money. I would have to charge considerably more than what I pay to get the books in the first place. That puts you in a kind of relation that is, as a small business owner, pretty predatory actually: you’re just feeding off the goodwill of the community in order to survive. And I don’t want to be in that position.

I’m also in a position where my wife is a professor at UMass and we don’t have kids, we own our house, and I’m someone who has generational wealth – I don’t, like, have a trust fund or anything, but like many white middle-class Americans, college-educated, I don’t have any student loan debt; I’m really privileged to be in that position. So it’s actually not necessary for me to squeeze every single penny out of this just to survive.

I’m not working right now. Because of the pandemic, my hours at Roundabout [Books] were cut, then I quit. But I can go out and get a job. Jamie has two full-time jobs and is working constantly, so Jamie doesn’t need to make a living from this, and neither do I.

MR: That’s really helpful, and I really appreciate that, not just the explanation but the orientation. So thank you very much for breaking that down so thoroughly. Just to keep hopscotching around, to go back to your community partnerships: How did those come together, and are there different types of community relationships and interfaces you’d like to build? What are the dreams there?

AR: Uh, hah, what are the dreams? I don’t really know. That’s such a great question, because a lot has changed, actually, since we started.

I wanted to do something with these profits that I didn’t feel entitled to. Great Falls Books Through Bars made sense as our first partner, and I just emailed them and said “this is what we’re doing, we want to support you,” but that has already changed. They have this book wishlist of in-demand but rarely donated books for prisoners, and I realized it would actually be very easy for us to post that listing to our site. We just set this up this month, and people have bought 11 books to donate that they wouldn’t have had, and probably didn’t even know GFBTB wanted these books. As far I’m concerned, that’s been wildly successful – I think it’s amazing that we can donate those books, and there will be more.

So in terms of where these partnerships can go, it’s a totally open question. If an organization or group has an idea, or I get an idea from looking at what they do, then really anything is possible. Hannah, from Looky Here in Greenfield, reached out to us about this [Josef] Albers book and we just bought a bunch of them. That’s more of a focused-around-a-single-title sort of partnership. Touch the Sky I found out about through this food distro that I’m part of that’s been organized by Pioneer Valley Workers Center.

It’s kind of experimental, but it’s already changed quite a bit just in the few months we’ve been doing this, and I don’t know where it’s going to go, but it’s exciting. I’m still learning about local groups that are doing these kinds of projects that aren’t non-profits, that aren’t well-connected with city governments and getting grants and stuff, but are doing really essential work, and often on a totally volunteer basis. Like Great Falls Books Through Bars: they have operating costs, they have expenses, and it’s exciting to be in a position where we can help them meet those expenses.

MR: I notice you developing these different collections, and you’re talking about this cooperative model where customers help determine what’s in the shop, but it also seems like maybe there are some priorities you guys have there – for instance, the “Down With Amazon” section. Do you want to talk a little bit more about those, and what you’re trying to spotlight?

AR: I don’t know if I would call our different collections “priorities.” A lot just depends on books that we have and the books we can get, and of course a ton depends on the requests that we get.

On the front page, like the Amazon collection, that’s stuff that I picked out because I think it’s cool. But the point is less to make it a priority than to give people the experience of being in a bookstore, because something I miss is being able to walk into a store and just browse and come upon a display or something that I didn’t know that I wanted. To have that feel of it being curated, to some degree, I think is really nice, and is part of making it feel like it’s a storefront – as opposed to being just a search bar, where you just search for a book and it’s either there or it’s not. That’s the goal with this.

Jamie hasn’t done one of these collections yet, but I’ve been trying to get her to do one; she’s just very busy. But there’s potential for anyone to do it, anyone who has a specific interest or wants to curate a list –  I think that it would be really cool to bring more people into the lists. Like I said, making it a cooperative thing, where people can participate without investing a ton of capital themselves and without like, doing this for a job, but they can still participate in crafting these collections.

MR: Cool. And yeah, that’s one of the things I think about a lot with Amazon, and beyond Amazon even –  this is kind of outdated, but like iTunes, for instance – these huge retail platforms where you kind of get the sense that the people that made them that don’t care about books or music or whatever. There has to be a degree of specificity that can only be achieved if someone cares, you know? So I really appreciate that.

AR: Yeah, exactly! Also, on the technical end, a lot of these sites just auto-generate all of the listings. Book sites just get an ISBN and use Amazon’s API, or Amazon uses – I don’t know where Amazon gets their book data, maybe from the distributors, but it’s literally generated by an algorithm.

We do batch uploads, but it is still manual – every single listing that’s featured on that front page is a listing that I’ve manually edited and selected the tags for, and put into the different categories, and thought about. That’s part of it, on the technical end: just the principle of it being like a bookstore, and having that feel of the listing was created by somebody who is actually interested in the book, and not just auto-generated from Amazon’s API.

MR: Just to cap it off, what are the different ways that the community can support Massive Bookshop and vice versa, and what are the different contact points you want people to know about?

AR: Well, people can support the bookshop by using it, and that also supports these community organizations, so that’s the most obvious way to do it. It helps to make the business what it is by bringing books in; the books that are requested become part of our inventory.

The other way they can be a part of it is just by reaching out to us and telling us how they want to be a part of it. And we’re open to really anything; we’re serious, on the About Us page, where it says “If you have an idea about how we might grow, please contact us.” All they have to do is email us and we can start talking about it.

If there are community groups, mutual aid projects, that people are part of that need support, they should reach out to us as well and tell us how we can support them, and we can talk about that together. The principle that undergirds all of this is the cooperative principle. Anyone who can think of any way to cooperate with this, or through this, is great. We’re open to it, and also open to being creative – because we don’t know what we’re doing. [Laughs.]

An abridged version of this interview appeared in the January 7, 2021 edition of the Montague Reporter.

Filed Under: News

“Home is the Best Place to Be.”

April 3, 2020

Slowing the spread of COVID-19.

Franklin County public health nurse Lisa White. (Photo courtesy of the Franklin Regional Council of Governments)

By SAMANTHA WOOD 

GREENFIELD – The new coronavirus which leads to the illness known as COVID-19 has been spreading in the community, and significantly among people who don’t know they are carrying it. These asymptomatic carriers may never become ill, or may have symptoms that are so mild, they might not raise any alarm.

This means some people who feel confident they aren’t sick have likely been infecting people with whom they come in contact. This could be true for anyone.

According to public health nurse Lisa White, who works for the Franklin Regional Council of Governments and is serving 17 local towns during the COVID-19 crisis, “we should assume anyone we come in contact with may be carrying” the virus.

Even when people do become sick, the incubation may be up to two weeks. “Prevention is really the key,” White said in an interview this week. “Home is the best place to be.”

Face Masks

On Friday, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated its guidelines for reducing the risk of transmission of the virus. The CDC is now advising everyone to wear cloth face masks in areas where there is a chance of being close to people outside of one’s household, such as at the grocery store.

“[T]he virus can spread between people interacting in close proximity – for example, speaking, coughing, or sneezing – even if those people are not exhibiting symptoms,” the agency’s most recent advisory states. “CDC recommends wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies) especially in areas of significant community-based transmission.”

Up to this time, the general public in the US has not embraced wearing face masks to lower the rates of transmission, and guidance on this has been contradictory.

In some other countries, general use of face masks during pandemics has been required of everyone out in public as part of basic hygiene protocol, and is believed to have played an important role in reducing the infection rate.

In an interview with Science magazine published March 27, 2020, George Gao, director-general of the China’s Center for Disease Control and Prevention, addressed the use of masks. Gao has participated in some of the early research on the new strain of coronavirus and has co-authored recent studies published in The New England Journal of Medicine on the identification of the virus and its transmission.

Gao spoke directly and unequivocally in favor of masks.

“The big mistake in the US and Europe, in my opinion, is that people aren’t wearing masks. This virus is transmitted by droplets and close contact. Droplets play a very important role – you’ve got to wear a mask, because when you speak, there are always droplets coming out of your mouth. Many people have asymptomatic or presymptomatic infections.”

The Czech Republic attributes some of its success in suppressing the spread of COVID-19 to the widespread use of masks. On March 28, a public service announcement about face masks was shared on YouTube. In less than four minutes, the Czech PSA illustrates how cloth face masks are effective at reducing the spread of infected droplets when worn by everyone, and simplifies this message to: I protect you; you protect me.

Professional-grade masks continue to be in short supply in the United States, and there is dire need for them among healthcare workers, who have the greatest risks of exposure to the virus.

“It is critical to emphasize that maintaining 6-feet social distancing remains important to slowing the spread of the virus.” the CDC’s new advisory says. “Cloth face coverings fashioned from household items or made at home from common materials at low cost can be used as an additional, voluntary public health measure.”

At Home, Just In Case

Testing for COVID-19 also remains difficult to access in the US. Even with testing, results may be delayed by many days and, according to the New York Times, tests may have a 30% false negative rate.

While widespread testing would be of use to track the illness and isolate outbreaks, White said, without it, the very small number of test results in Franklin County shows a tiny window of the actual illness in our area, and may even give people a false sense of security.

“The priority is for treating people with severe illness,” White told the Reporter, “regardless of how they were diagnosed.”

When people become ill with symptoms that are consistent with COVID-19, they are being advised to stay home to heal unless their symptoms are severe, such as trouble breathing. White recommends that sick people consult with a healthcare provider or public nurse. The state Department of Public Health has posted detailed advice on how to assess symptoms, when to seek more care, and how to reduce exposure for other members of the household.

But the most important thing, White said, is that “home is the best place to be.” She emphasized social distance guidelines and the importance of not spreading the virus through contact with other people.

Along with concerns about exposure to COVID-19, the grim news and changes to work, school, and other routines affect everyone and leave many people feeling more anxious. White advised people to use video calls and other forms of communication to stay in touch with friends and loved ones.

“To practice simple things that bring peace and enjoyment,” White said, “is as important as ever.”

Filed Under: News

What’s it Like to Have COVID-19?

April 3, 2020

An interview with Jessamyn Smith.

Jessamyn Smyth, a West County resident recovering from COVID-19. (Photo by Rebecca Aldous)

By SAMANTHA WOOD

WEST COUNTY – People in Franklin County are coming down with the illness caused by the new coronavirus, COVID-19. While testing is still hard to come by, the virus is spreading in the community and making people sick.

According to Franklin Regional Council of Governments public health nurse Lisa White, the most important thing now is care for people who are ill. “We should assume anyone we come in contact with may be carrying the virus,” White said in an interview this week.

Jessamyn Smyth, a Franklin County hilltown resident who is recovering from COVID-19, says she is at high risk for complications, and did everything she could to avoid catching this virus. She thinks it was likely that she was exposed through her partner, who was working outside the home but has remained asymptomatic.

Smyth, who has a background in public health and teaches communications, granted the Montague Reporter an interview by email because COVID-19 makes her cough. In the last week, she has experienced respiratory distress and has been to the emergency room. She continues to recover at home as of press time, and is still awaiting test results.

This interview has been edited for length.

Montague Reporter: What were the first signs you had of coronavirus? How did you get tested?

Jessamyn Smyth: I had a feeling of intense pain and pressure in my chest. The next morning I woke up with a fever of 100 and a spasmodic cough, full body pain, GI issues, worsening lung pain. That seems like a long time ago now (it’s been a long week and a half or so!).

Because of test shortages, while I was still breathing okay I didn’t meet the criteria for one of the few tests in Western Mass., even though I am in a “medically vulnerable” group. When I started having real breathing difficulty, my primary care doctor referred me to the emergency respiratory clinic set up in Northampton.

The doc there was both extraordinarily kind and realist, diagnosing corona, discussing what that may mean for me in particular, safety planning with me about when to bolt for the ER and how we hope I won’t have to, all of that. The nasopharyngeal swab used in the test is pretty uncomfortable, but she was even very honest with me about that – I appreciate how she treated me with calm, exact kindness, and respectful directness about both the disease and my risks, more than I can say. I’m grateful for all the work healthcare people are doing right now. They are exhausted already.

MR: How do you think you were exposed to the virus?

JS: Knowing that my hereditary primary immune deficiency and allergy to all groups of antibiotics makes me high risk for complications of coronavirus (and difficult to treat if I got it), I took this contagion very seriously far before most folks around me really understood the dangers. I began fully self-isolating on March 10, teaching and working virtually.

My partner began isolating at home with me on March 15, but was exposed to several high risk vectors in the interim. The span the docs here are seeing between exposure and symptoms for those who get sick is four days, so it seems I got it from him during that period. He’s asymptomatic, which, we have learned from recent studies published in Nature, as many as 60% of all carriers are. That’s 6 in 10 people transmitting with no visible symptoms.

[Editors’ note: Franklin County public health nurse Lisa White told us this week that the incubation period may be up to two weeks.]

This is why self-quarantining matters, and we have to get this message out. People think they (and their kids and their kids’ activities and their back and forth to this and that house and etc.) are okay – and they aren’t, so they are putting other people’s lives at risk.

Everyone needs to isolate themselves and their families in place until we get a better handle on this virus, and use technology to maintain social and familial connections. Anything else, at this point, will be lethal.

MR: Have you been told what you might be able to expect during the illness?

JS: COVID-19 is fierce and brutal, and unlike any illness I’ve felt. I’m told my symptoms – high fever for a long time, extremely painful lungs, coughing, GI symptoms, bone, joint, and muscle pain, weakness and exhaustion – are the common constellation. The lung pain is bizarre, and quite scary.

I’m told that if all goes well, I can expect to be seriously sick for 2-3 weeks, that the exhaustion after the virus sticks around for a month or more depending on how much damage was done, and that some people need respiratory therapy to regain normal lung function.

If all doesn’t go well, bacterial infections take advantage of the virus-weakened lungs, people get bilateral pneumonia and can’t breathe, and they rush to the hospital for respiratory support (ventilator, other forms of life-support – and antibiotics for the bacterial aspect, which are unfortunately life-threatening for me).

I’m a swimmer and cyclist, and so very strong in spite of the immune system issue. I asked the doc who diagnosed me if being fit would help me, hoping it would: she said coronavirus truly doesn’t care. It either complicates or it doesn’t, if I understand correctly, in largest part because of random factors in each person’s immune response and bacterial situations. It can certainly be complicated by existing issues, but life or death with COVID-19 not a moral issue. It’s not a behavioral choice. This is a vicious disease that is extremely communicable and dangerous.

MR: You have written about disability, and now about disability rights in the pandemic. What do you want people in our community to know/think/do about this issue?

JS: What happens when people go into respiratory emergency is when we face what is fast becoming the ethical and legal battle of our time. The inadequate number of ventilators available to cope with the casualties of COVID-19 is causing medical personnel around the world to be having to choose who gets lifesaving treatment and who is left to die.

For people with disabilities, as a result, the word “triage” has begun to inspire terror, because many are willing to talk about this in the language of eugenics and social Darwinism, quickly and easily discarding the value of the lives of our elders and anyone who is “medically complicated,” i.e.: disabled.

Aktion T4, the Nazi program to eradicate people with disabilities, is very much on many advocates’ minds these days as some of the language we hear in current media mirrors that of older genocidal framework. More prosaically, we are feeling the dangerous escalation of the daily assumptions we too often live with: that our work, our art, our community involvement, our contributions to the economy, our bodies, are worth less than those of (temporarily) able-bodied people’s. Italy in particular has been sharing tragic and horrific stories on this “rationing” front, but it has begun happening and being planned for here, too: people are very openly saying that only young, healthy people should be given the ventilators, while our elders and people with disabilities should be left to die rather than “wasting” resources on them when they might be harder to save.

There are currently multiple complaints and budding lawsuits filed with the US Department of Health and Human Services’s Office of Civil Rights over “treatment rationing plans” which, in direct violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), discriminate against people with disabilities – including anyone elderly.

All of us can support these, and be in touch with our legislators about this issue.

While I understand the pressures health care systems and doctors face, it is so important for everyone to understand that the difference between a disabled person and a (temporarily) able bodied one is one fraction of a second or an inch in a car crash, one genetic twist, one illness, or, most inevitably and simply, some years. Every single one of us will become disabled to greater or lesser degrees, if nothing else, simply by aging.

We are not in the business of ascribing worth to some lives and not others. The ventilator problem must be solved by making more ventilators.  The personnel issues must be solved by making more personal protective equipment (PPE). And so on.

Everyone can support this, too. Working to improve access to medical supplies across the country will save thousands upon thousands of people’s lives.

People can also speak to their local hospital administrators, and require both transparency and dialogue about how the hospital will be making the transition from ethics driven by individual-centered care (what we do in normal times) to ethics driven by community-centered care (what we have to do in pandemics). They can work with their local hospitals to establish exactly what is needed to care for people in a just way, and how we as a community can make that happen, even imperfectly.

Disability Discrimination Complaint Filed over COVID-19 Treatment Rationing Plan in Washington State

Second Complaint Regarding Illegal Disability Discrimination in Treatment Rationing During COVID-19 Pandemic

MR: Have local public health officials been checking in with you? Do you know if they have charted your recent contacts?

JS: They would have had to track my asymptomatic partner and the (also probably largely asymptomatic) vector-networks through which he got it. The docs are as certain as they can be that I quarantined before getting the virus, and infected no one as a result.

[When reached this week by the Montague Reporter, the chair of the local board of health in Smyth’s town said there are currently no known cases of COVID-19 in their town. When presented with this story, they clarified, saying that the only data they have to work with is the daily update in the state system, which is based only on positive test results. Clinical diagnoses – when, absent a test result, a medical professional assesses a patient and comes to the conclusion that all the symptoms point to COVID-19 – are not entered into the state system. These cases are not being tracked.]

At this point, though, here is the important part: we are in “community spread.” This public health term means that the disease can no longer be tracked through that one person who went out of the country or was on that one cruise ship or whatever – it is transmitting widely and invisibly throughout the community, and as more and more tests become available, we will see that it is already everywhere.

Tracking individuals is no longer the strategy. And of course, targeting individuals who are sick, or scapegoating them in any way, is not only stupid but dangerous: it’s here, people have it, they are transmitting it without knowing they have it, vulnerable people are dying, more will die, and “flattening the curve” by staying home in self-quarantine, hard as that is, is the best tool we have to try to keep our hospitals up and running.

The social and public health strategy needs to be community-wide response with information toward prevention for those who haven’t yet gotten it, and a wide array of supports for those who were already exposed. These approaches need to go hand in hand, so as few people as possible get sick and those who already are sick can recover.

People who are saying “there are no cases in…” are kidding themselves at this point: what they can accurately say is “we haven’t had any positive tests reported to us yet in [X town], but everyone should assume that the corona virus is here, a lot of the transmission is invisible, and we need to be taking every precaution we can.”

This is why I have been willing to share some of my experience publicly by talking with you, or sharing my experience or good public health information or advocacy opportunities in my Facebook network of writers and professors who have communication and education platforms of their own: we need to lay aside the misconceptions we cannot afford, and get it right. Now. Lives depend on it as we have never seen.

MR: You told me you have a background in public health education. Can you explain a bit about that, and how that has informed your response/perspective to this situation?

JS: I teach interdisciplinary Humanities at Bard Microcollege in Holyoke, and also do advocacy and public relations for Stavros (a disability advocacy organization) in Amherst. When I started my career in the ‘90s, I worked in HIV counseling and testing, harm reduction, domestic violence and sexual assault crisis response and prevention, and community education for violence prevention and justice. I now integrate that public health work into the teaching of writing and communications, fine arts, and community building.

In this pandemic, we have a perfect storm of vulnerabilities becoming visible: people who are quarantined with their batterers, homeless or incarcerated or undocumented people who cannot get help or escape the virus, medically vulnerable people with disabilities being discussed in mass media as essentially ballast, and a media moment of echo chambers in which people are getting very bad information and little else, which is spreading the virus and preventing smart and coordinated public health response nationally.

Any voice I have, and any understanding I can gain and refine and share, I want to use in service of protecting the most vulnerable among us. Part of that is really listening, learning from, and understanding the experiences of the most vulnerable. Part of that is raising awareness in more privileged people about how they can be using their positions to help rather than make it worse. Part of that is being willing to share my own experience, at times, when that can be appropriate or helpful.

Mostly, right now, I have to focus on getting well, and hope I don’t get the complications so many people have already faced. But while I’m doing that, I can give what information and advocacy I can to my communities. And I have been deeply moved by how much kindness and loving support many of my communities have offered me; it’s really been holding me up through this.

We are at the point of there needing to be one public approach to this: assume that you have been exposed already, and act accordingly to protect the medically vulnerable people around you, who are much more likely to get fatal complications if you infect them. Stay home.

This is what we have now, yes? Each other. It sounds a lot cheesier than I usually am, but it really might just be the big truth.

 

Filed Under: News

What’s Happening at the Hospital?

April 3, 2020

Baystate Health is withholding local statistics from cities and towns.

 

Baystate Franklin Medical Center in Greenfield. (Reporter file photo)

By SAMANTHA WOOD

FRANKLIN COUNTY – For several weeks, the local hospital company Baystate Health has released daily counts on the total number of people it has tested for COVID-19, the illness caused by the new coronavirus. These numbers include positive and negative test results for the entire chain, which includes four hospitals in Hampden County and one in Greenfield. Baystate has refused to release more detailed information about each hospital, and is not granting interviews.

In an interview this week, Franklin Regional Council of Governments public health nurse Lisa White explained asymptomatic spread has led to infection among people who don’t know they are spreading the virus. Some will never become ill, or will have such mild symptoms they won’t seek care.

“We should assume anyone we come in contact with may be carrying” the virus, White said.

Because testing is not widely available, positive test results cannot give an accurate picture of the presence of the virus in the community.

“It is popping,” White said. “People are getting sick.”

When residents experiencing symptoms reach out to a public health nurse or their own clinician, state and federal health authorities advise that they be instructed to stay home as long as possible. Only people who are very sick are advised to go to a hospital, and these are the people most likely to get tested. Then it takes days to get test results.

“The priority is for treating people with severe illness,” White said, “regardless of how they were diagnosed.”

As people are quarantined and isolated at home, tracking by public officials is haphazard at best. It appears that no public agency is tracking everyone who is sick with COVID-19 symptoms at home.

The state Department of Public Health tracks positive COVID-19 cases in a database known as the Massachusetts Virtual Epidemiologic Network (MAVEN), but several local officials we spoke with said the state is likely several days behind in updating that data. Meanwhile, the tests themselves may have a 30% false negative rate, according to a recent report in the New York Times, which cited research on the disease in China.

Beyond this tracking system, there is broad agreement that many more people are now sick with COVID-19 in Franklin County than are being tested. The numbers of those who seek treatment in hospitals may provide a broader view of the illness’s scope and spread than do positive test results alone.

A Communication Gap

Emergency management teams in Franklin County are collaborating across town lines to develop plans for adding bed capacity, ramping up staff, and working to find much-need personal protective equipment (PPE), which has been in short supply nationally.

Local leaders are working to pull together all of the data they can to understand what is happening in real time, and plan in anticipation of changing needs. Each community is different, and responses must take into account variations in demographics, level of need, medical risk factors, and geography.

When asked about emergency planning for an expected surge in COVID-19 illness in Franklin County in mid-to-late April, a source in local municipal government told the Montague Reporter that Baystate Health has not been forthcoming with necessary information for local towns. The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said emergency planners have sought details related to increasing treatment capacity and staffing at Baystate Franklin Medical Center, but have thus far received only a vague response from hospital administrators.

Without this information, the source said, municipal leaders cannot plan effectively in a public health crisis.

No “Hospital-Specific Data”

Baystate Health owns Baystate Franklin Medical Center in Greenfield, Baystate Medical Center and Baystate Children’s Hospital in Springfield, Baystate Noble Hospital in Westfield, and Baystate Wing Hospital in Palmer.

The Reporter reached out to the hospital company on Wednesday with questions about treatment capacity at the Greenfield hospital, and whether the company was coordinating with municipal emergency management teams. In response, Baystate’s media relations office sent a statement from Ronald Bryant, the president of Baystate Franklin Medical Center, saying: “Baystate Health has plans in place throughout the health system to accommodate a surge of patients as needed and we are prioritizing all available resources in support of our efforts to address the public health needs associated with COVID-19.”

Asked more detailed questions Thursday morning – including the number of COVID-19 patients currently being treated at the Greenfield hospital, the capacity that can be treated there, how many ventilators the hospital has, information regarding surge plans, and the number of employees out sick – another Baystate Health spokesperson replied in an email, “We do not have that information.”

On Friday the company issued its daily press release listing what have been the routine, system-wide totals: 1,889 people have been tested, 1,386 have come back negative, 387 have tested positive, and there are 116 pending results.

In addition, the release said, “Currently within BH, we are caring for 139 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, 41 of whom are in our critical care units; we are also caring for 65 hospitalized patients who are under investigation for COVID-19 infection. We are not reporting hospital-specific data to ensure patient privacy is maintained, especially in our smaller facilities.”

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, also known as HIPAA, protects patient privacy by preventing hospitals from disclosing information that would individually identify a patient. It does not cover information that does not reveal an individual’s identity.

Greenfield Releasing Numbers

On Thursday, the office of Greenfield Mayor Roxann Wedegartner announced it would begin releasing its own daily updates of local numbers of positive tests on the city website. As of Friday, the city reports that 46 Greenfield residents have tested positive, up from 25 the day before.

The mayor’s office said that as of mid-day Thursday, five Greenfield residents had died of COVID-19. On Friday that count had risen to eight.

While up-to-date figures on countywide cases are not available, the state releases a daily report breaking down positive test results by county. Thursday’s report – which local officials say may be as many as three to five days behind – listed 85 confirmed cases in Franklin County as a whole.

Test results are just one piece of the puzzle as communities respond to the virus. Given the difficulty of getting tested for COVID-19 and the possibility of false negative results, these figures may be less immediately significant in the effort to get a sense of the virus’s community spread than the numbers, currently guarded by Baystate Health, of local people suffering and dying from its disease.

Filed Under: News

Footer

Search

Make a payment

Public Notices

Montague Reporter © 2025 · Site Design by Ajitate